Discuz! Board

 找回密碼
 立即註冊
搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 4|回復: 0

Paulo Henrique Amorim loses new lawsuit against Mainardi

[複製鏈接]

1

主題

1

帖子

5

積分

新手上路

Rank: 1

積分
5
發表於 2024-3-12 17:32:02 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式
Accused of fabricating news to benefit those who pay for it and harm his sponsors' competitors, blogger Paulo Henrique Amorim did not like seeing himself in the position of window dressing. He sued journalist Diogo Mainardi , from Veja magazine , in the civil and criminal spheres. In the first case, he lost. In the second, too. And he was also ordered, this week, to pay the legal costs and fees of Mainardi's lawyers — who was represented by Lourival J. Santos and Alexandre Fidalgo. Amorim's lawyers have already appealed. “We hope that the Court of Justice can provide the appeal”, stated José Rubens Machado de Campos. Paulo Henrique Amorim's initiative attracted attention. After all, he gained fame for the virulence of his attacks in the press.

In an interview with Folha de S.Paulo he has already defined his activity as “an exercise in verbal beating” and the keys on his computer as “those buttons that fire missiles”. According to Phone Number List Mainardi, Amorim charged R$, per month for the bombing. The columnist for Veja states that the blogger “resumed the most filthy practices in journalism, such as blackmail, lies, propaganda of power and paid articles”. The Observatório da Imprensa portal has already described Amorim as “a prototype of the lyncher. Jammer paradigm. Breakdown provoking agent”. But it was another attitude that caused more strangeness in the proceedings: he asked for, and obtained, the protective cloak of judicial secrecy so that information regarding the dispute would not be disclosed.



After all, if journalism is based on the principle of public exposure, one can imagine that journalists are defenders of publicity and not of secrecy. Judge Angélica Nagao, from Fórum de Pinheiros, who refused Amorim's request to punish Mainardi, seems to have understood that anyone who likes to throw stones at other people's roofs should not be surprised by leaks in their kitchen. And what's more: disagreements between journalists, in general, are healthy. Complicities are broken and these opportunities in which the press exercises the rigor it usually applies to others are rare. Fuzzy Transactions In the episode involving Paulo Henrique Amorim, for example, relevant accusations came to light at a time when the desirability of a new press law was being discussed.


回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

Archiver|手機版|自動贊助|GameHost抗攻擊論壇

GMT+8, 2025-2-7 14:51 , Processed in 0.072646 second(s), 19 queries .

抗攻擊 by GameHost X3.4

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
一粒米 | 中興米 | 論壇美工 | 設計 抗ddos | 天堂私服 | ddos | ddos | 防ddos | 防禦ddos | 防ddos主機 | 天堂美工 | 設計 防ddos主機 | 抗ddos主機 | 抗ddos | 抗ddos主機 | 抗攻擊論壇 | 天堂自動贊助 | 免費論壇 | 天堂私服 | 天堂123 | 台南清潔 | 天堂 | 天堂私服 | 免費論壇申請 | 抗ddos | 虛擬主機 | 實體主機 | vps | 網域註冊 | 抗攻擊遊戲主機 | ddos |